Dr. Lowthorp With New West Lakeview Family Medicine in Littleton

You know about how individuals gain command of the power of the State and then abuse that power similar sometime US President George "Dubya" Bush-league?  "Dubya" started a war in Iraq which was highly assisting for some US businesses.  He achieved this b y challenge Republic of iraq had a nuclear weapons program which was a serious earth security threat when Iraq did non and when information technology had already been bombed into oblivion by the war his Dad George Bush Snr waged on Iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'fair game' for Bush-league UK The Telegraph Past Chrissy Iley 15 February 2011.

Recall how Bush was supported by UK Premier Tony Blair who helped past persuading the British Parliament to join the US with faked "intelligence" of Iraq'due south weapons of mass destruction which did not exist simply which Blair claimed could be deployed within 40 minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If yous remember that then you will know how these kinds of people manipulate the media.  Observe how they persuade us we are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they can save us all if we trust them?

This trickery is not new.  It had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this day.

On CHS we wrote previously well-nigh how unscientific the merits is that smallpox was eradicated past vaccination when that bluntly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the disease came about every bit a result of the interaction of iii completely different factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living conditions, especially nutrition and sanitation. The effect cannot be attributable to the smallpox vaccine – any vaccine which takes over 100 years to work ipso facto proves itself not to have:

Modest Pox – Big Lie – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

There was a nasty disease called smallpox and it did impale people long agone.

This was especially the case when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for piece of work and choked them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for breeding and spreading disease: London's first park built after rich feared affliction spread from slums UK The Independent By Andy McSmith Fri 07 Nov 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized World.

The eye and upper classes needed to be reassured the State would keep them condom from the threat of disease.  The majority of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could achieve this past ensuring the and so truly "great unwashed" masses would be vaccinated and the illness controlled.  The trouble was this was a myth but the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did not work and sometimes killed as many or more than the disease itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" still contracted the disease: Smallpox Mortality, UK, USA, Sweden.

Now you can read a relatively brusk but well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its role in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ past Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD – August 27, 2013

SMALLPOX MORTALITY- UK, USA & SWEDEN

In the graphs below notice the large numbers of deaths acquired by the smallpox vaccine itself.  Past 1901 in the UK, more people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the affliction dimished with improved living standards and was not vanquished by vaccination, as the medical "consensus" view tells united states. Any vaccine which takes 100 years to "piece of work" did not.  On any scientific analysis of the history and data, crediting smallpox vaccine for the decline in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the Urban center of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the remainder of the UK and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox decease rates plummeted [see table beneath].  Leicester'southward approach besides price far less.

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" By J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Unabridged Volume as .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

Table 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Proper noun.	Period.	Modest-Pox.  Cases	Small-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-rate per cent. of Cases
Nihon	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.eight
British Army (United Kingdom)	1860-1908	one,355	96	7.1
British Ground forces (India)	1860-1908	2,753	307	eleven.one
British Army (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	8.eight
Majestic Navy	1860-1908	two,909	234	viii.0
G Totals and example fatality rate per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.3
Leicester (since giving up vaccination)	1880-1908	1,206	61	5.one

Biggs said "In this comparing, I have given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, and so that they may be compared either mode with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist language, may I ask, if the excessive small-pox fatality of Nippon, of the British Army, and of the Royal Navy, are not due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? It would beget an interesting psychical written report were we able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would have soared with a corresponding result—only on the opposite side."

Table 29.

Small-Pox Epidemics, Cost, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Status	Small-scale-Pox Cases	Small-Pox Deaths	Fatality-rate Per Cent	Price of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	9,659	1,594	xvi.fifty	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	3,417	377	xi.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	seven,066	688	9.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	5.34	£ii,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	30	four.ten	£1,602

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD

– Baronial 27, 2013

With the approaching flu flavour and the enthusiastic calls to use the flu vaccine, you might be wondering where the idea of vaccination got its start. Where did the idea of injecting whole or bits of microbes and other substances into people in an endeavor to provide protection against contagious disease brainstorm?

Many medical and history books nowadays a simple tale of the origin of vaccination. Most present the same basic tale of the brilliant observation of a simple country doctor and his courage in attempting to thwart a deadly and frightening disease of that fourth dimension – smallpox, or as information technology was often called the speckled monster. In a recent and pop book, The Panic Virus, the writer reiterates this classic tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an eight-year quondam male child named James Phipps to exam his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes'south cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd made in Phipps's hands. The boy came down with a slight fever, but nothing more. After, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should have resulted in a full-blown, albeit balmy, example of the disease. Nothing happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox once more; once again, nothing. [1]

Edward Jenner's thought eventually became known as vaccination, which is derived from the Latin word for cow – vacca. It was originally referred to as cowpoxing, but eventually the term vaccination was adopted. As the story goes, with this invention in place, smallpox would exist tamed and the world would be freed from the terror of the disease.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is not unlike the classic Greek legends of Theseus defeating the kid-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the deadly ophidian-headed Medusa, or many other classic stories of the brave hero defeating a deadly enemy. The Jenner legend has been reduced to a elementary and memorable story of a hero defeating the deadly enemy, smallpox. Authors claim that with vaccination in identify, "billions of lives" have been saved.[2]

Just legendary heroes, especially those that are used to support a conventionalities, achieve an iconic status while whatever unsavory aspects nearly the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well before the story of our hero. It begins with the concept of using small amounts of smallpox pus and scratching it into the arms of good for you people. This idea was introduced to the Western world by Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with knowledge of the practice of inoculation confronting smallpox, known as variolation. This type of inoculation was simply a matter of infecting a person with smallpox at a time and in a setting of his choosing. The idea behind inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would do better against the disease than if they contracted it at some possibly less desirable time and identify in the time to come.

The idea was embraced past the medical profession and enthusiastically practiced. But because of the complication and danger involved, inoculation remained an functioning that could only exist afforded by the wealthy.[3] The procedure did ofttimes help protect the individual that was inoculated, only there was still an estimated 2-5% that died as a result.[4,v] Nevertheless, this was an improvement compared to a xx-25% mortality rate in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[6] But, was the departure in bloodshed due to inoculation alone? Or could information technology have had something to do with the fact that the wealthy had amend access to more than nutritious food and a cleaner environs than the majority of society?

In that location was one major and generally unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more than deaths than there would have been naturally. In a 1764 article the author recognized that smallpox was a contagious disease and that the practise of variolation would create new vectors to spread information technology. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years before the introduction of variolation to the 38 years after, and constitute that smallpox deaths had increased⎯not decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse problems, considering information technology caused more deaths than lives saved.

It is incontestably like the plague a contagious disease, what tends to end the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends it; what tends to spread the contamination, tends to increase that danger; the practice of Inoculation manifestly tends to spread the contagion, for a contagious disease is produced past Inoculation where information technology would non otherwise take been produced; the place where it is thus produced becomes a middle of contamination, whence it spreads non less fatally or widely than it would spread from a center where the illness should happen in a natural fashion; these centers of contamination are manifestly multiplied very greatly by Inoculation . . .[7]

However, while the popularity of variolation varied, the problem of it spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Because variolation had become a very lucrative procedure information technology was enthusiastically continued by most of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early on 1800s. Smallpox connected to be spread by this medically-sanctioned procedure.

Now enters the hero of our legend. It was rumored amid milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect 1 from smallpox. In 1796, assertive these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an 8-year-old boy named James Phipps. He took disease matter that he believed to be cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with it. He later deliberately exposed the kid to smallpox equally a test to see if he was protected past the cowpox inoculation. When the male child did non contract clinical smallpox, it was assumed that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results claiming lifelong protection against smallpox using his discovery with but rumors to support his contention. While he promoted the utilize of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would be immune to smallpox, there were doctors of the time who challenged this myth, because they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a meeting of the Medico-Convivial Order, Jenner was ridiculed over his practice.

But he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at it. The moo-cow doctors could have told him of hundreds of cases where small-pox had followed cow-pox . . . [8]

From the beginning there were issues with Jenner's procedure. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox affair obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were then tested by being inoculated with smallpox to see if the cowpox procedure had been constructive. All of them developed smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect any of them. Jenner received the report but decided to ignore the results because they were not in support of his theory.[9]

Vaccination was quickly embraced by many in the medical profession as the answer to combating smallpox. By 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the conventionalities that the procedure would produce lifelong protection. The medical customs continued to embrace Jenner's ideas amidst numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early reports indicated that at that place were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were yet dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Kid was vaccinated by Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the cease of the yr 1799. A month later it was inoculated with minor-pox matter without event, and a few months subsequently took confluent pocket-sized-pox and died. ii. A woman-servant to Mr. Hazard, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had cow-pox in the coincidental style from milking. Seven years afterwards she became nurse to Yarmouth Hospital, where she defenseless small-pox, and died. iii and four. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, three years of age, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summer of 1804. Both contracted small-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . 13. The kid of Mr. R died of pocket-sized-pox in Oct 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were assured of its security. The vaccinator's name was concealed. xiv. The child of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam'due south role . . . died of small-pox a year after vaccination.[10]

Reports through the early 1800s began to accumulate showing vaccination was non living up to its promise to protect from smallpox. A written report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of pocket-size-pox after vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[xi] Note that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an 18% fatality rate and is essentially the same fatality rate as smallpox before vaccination was introduced. This high fatality charge per unit forth with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a directly challenge to this new and highly lauded medical process.

Another article in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering nether Pocket-size Pox, who have previously undergone Vaccination by the most skillful practitioners, is at present alarmingly nifty.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Chocolate-brown, a surgeon with xxx years of feel in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an article discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no one in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine practice." Just after vaccinating 1,200 persons, he became disappointed in the promise of vaccination. His experience was that, afterward vaccination, people nonetheless could contract and even die from smallpox, and that he could no longer support the practice.[13]

Like today, surgeons and doctors of the time were handsomely compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a tendency to embrace it every bit a new course of income. It is therefore quite meaning for a doctor to take spoken out against it every bit Dr. Chocolate-brown did.

Continued observations showed that smallpox could notwithstanding infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could too be infected.

. . . during the years 1820, i, and, ii [1820-1822] there was a dandy hubbub about the small-pox. Information technology bankrupt out with the swell epidemic to the north . . . It pressed shut to home to Dr. Jenner himself . . . It attacked many who had had small-pox earlier, and often severely; about to death; and of those who had been vaccinated, it left some alone, but cruel upon great numbers.[14]

William Cobbett was a farmer, journalist, and English pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote about the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to be an unproven and fraudulent medical exercise. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons cow-poxed past JENNER HIMSELF, take taken the existent small-pox later on, and have either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![15]

During this time vaccine material was the "humanized" form, which meant that textile was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the side by side person. Arm-to-arm vaccination connected for decades, simply as failures increased at that place was a conventionalities that the vaccine had lost its original supposed potency, and there were calls to obtain fresh textile directly from cows.[16]

While the legend maintained that the vaccine material came from cows, Jenner actually believed the material originated from an infectious status of horses called the "grease." From this and other behavior, in that location were many attempts to recreate an original cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was simply smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow made into a new disease.[18] This faulty belief would issue in the creation of more smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a man who died from smallpox and inoculated it onto a cow's udder. He then took pus from that moo-cow and used it to vaccinate people. A big smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[19] A later inquiry adamant that this was nil more than the old practice of smallpox inoculation.[20]

Not only was vaccination failing and causing smallpox epidemics, only there were likewise reports of deaths from other causes shortly after vaccination. For case, a skin condition chosen erysipelas was a peculiarly prolonged and painful fashion to die.

. . . a boy from Somers-town, aged 5 years, "pocket-size-pox confluent, unmodified (9 days)." He had been vaccinated at the age of 4 months; i cicatrix . . . the wife of a labourer, from Lambeth, aged 22 years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (8 days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; two good cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, aged ten weeks, and the son of a sugar baker, anile 13 weeks, died of "full general erysipelas after vaccination, effusion of the brain."[21]

Because arm-to-arm vaccination was being used, other diseases could be spread causing various epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke earlier the Academy at Paris.

Starting time I rejected the idea that syphilis could be transplanted by vaccination. Only facts accumulated more and more, and now I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis by means of the vaccine. I exercise this very reluctantly. At nowadays I exercise not hesitate longer to admit and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

Equally it became increasingly articulate throughout the 1800s to more doctors and citizens that vaccination was not what it was promised to be, refusals increased. In club to deal with this, the judicial organisation intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a ready of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did nothing to adjourn the problem of smallpox. Data from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting effectually 1837, there were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the smashing 1872 epidemic. Later on 1855, there were further smallpox epidemics in 1859-60, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the near severe smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These echo smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted past Massachusetts in 1855 had no result at all (Graph 1). In fact, more than people died in the twenty years later the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the twenty years earlier.

Graph 1: Boston smallpox bloodshed rate from 1841 to 1880.

By this signal, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection against smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were fabricated that vaccination made smallpox less likely to kill or that smallpox would be milder. Calls were and so made for revaccination. Claims were fabricated that revaccination had to be performed anywhere from yearly to every 10 years.[25]

While the majority of the medical profession supported vaccination, there were those that spoke out against the procedure. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent physician of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were being made past vaccinators. Immense financial gain combined with the force of law created the perfect surround that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western world.

The public vaccinators have received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 alone they amounted to £54,727, and in the present year they will become most a quarter meg. Other sums, too, which I cannot name, have been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has ever a quack remedy produced so much gain?

[26]

In England, governmental control strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did not vaccinate their children. However, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics continued to occur. A nifty pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, even those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French army is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian war there were twenty-three thousand iv hundred and sixty-nine cases of small-scale-pox in that ground forces. The London Lancet of July fifteen, 1871 said:

Of nine thousand three hundred and ninety-two minor-pox patients in London hospitals, six k 8 hundred and fifty-four had been vaccinated. Seventeen and 1-one-half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole country more than 1 hundred and twenty-ii one thousand vaccinated persons have suffered from small-pox . . . Official returns from Germany bear witness that between 1870 and 1885 one 1000000 vaccinated persons died from small-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine safe, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal liberty and liberty through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine motility. People began to resist the government and chose to pay fines. Some even accustomed imprisonment rather than assuasive vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backfire culminated in the groovy demonstration in Leicester England, in 1885. That aforementioned yr Leicester's government, which had pushed for vaccination through the use of fines and jail time, was replaced with a new government that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. By 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to 10%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a cheap and effective ways that eliminated the need for vaccination. Nonetheless, there were dire predictions from the majority of the medical community that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the low vaccination charge per unit would consequence in a terrible "massacre," specially in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the majority of the town's residents were steadfast in their belief that vaccination was not necessary to command smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would eventually be plagued with disaster never did come up to laissez passer. Low vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[xxx] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall decrease in smallpox deaths (Graph 2). Leicester showed that by abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed as the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were high.

The experience of unvaccinated Leicester is an heart-opener to the people and an eye-sore to the pro-vaccinists the earth over. Here is a not bad manufacturing town having a population of nearly a quarter of a meg, which has demonstrated past a crucial test of an experience extending over a period of more than a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to small-pox and far less afflicted past that illness since it abandoned vaccination than information technology was at a time when ninety-5 per cent of its births were vaccinated and its adult population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was often promoted equally a condom procedure, information technology often caused sickness or even death. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more than 1,600 in England (Graph three). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the same (Graph 4).

Graph 2: Leicester England smallpox mortality rate vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph 3: England and Wales total deaths from cowpox and other effects of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph 4: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the terminate of the 1800s, smallpox changed its character. After the summer of 1897, the severe type of smallpox with its high death charge per unit, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the Usa. Smallpox turned from a disease that killed 1 in 5 of its victims to 1 that only killed anywhere from 1 in 50 and later to as low as i in 380. The disease could withal kill, simply having become so much milder, it was often mistaken for various other pox infections or skin eruptions.

During 1896 a very mild type of smallpox began to prevail in the S and later gradually spread over the land. The mortality was very depression and it [smallpox] was usually at first mistaken for chicken pox. . .[32]

The author of a 1913 article in The Journal of Infectious Diseases presented a table showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox decease charge per unit was around 20%, as it had been historically. The table as well showed that after 1896 the death rate fell off rapidly, starting with 6% in 1897 to as low every bit 0.26% by 1908. As the mild form of smallpox replaced the classic type, smallpox could exist difficult to tell from chickenpox, which was, by this time, considered a balmy disease of childhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a minor communicable disease of childhood, and is importantly important because it ofttimes gives rising to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of mild smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very difficult to differentiate clinically.[33]

Past the 1920s it was recognized that the new form of smallpox produced little in the way of symptoms, even though few had been vaccinated.

Private cases, or even epidemics, occur in which, although there has been no protection by vaccination, the class of the disease is extremely mild. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent-minded, and the constitutional symptoms mild or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely depression vaccine coverage rate, there was never a resurgence of smallpox. Fifty-fifty though smallpox was not a major result, the exercise of smallpox vaccination continued from the fourth dimension of the last smallpox death in the United States in 1948 upward until 1963. This resulted in an estimated 5,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 report detailed the cases of ix children in which 2 died of a skin condition due to vaccination, now being termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this disease was estimated by the authors to be between 1 in xx,000 to 1 in 100,000 with a fatality rate of iv to 40%.[35] Even so, they best-selling that most cases were not reported and at that place was no authentic bookkeeping on this issue of vaccination. There were also an estimated 200 to 300 deaths equally the result of smallpox vaccination, while during the aforementioned time there had only been i smallpox death in 1948.[36]

The last smallpox death in the U.s. following an importation occurred in 1948, simply since that fourth dimension there accept been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is notwithstanding occurring today, every bit recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected by his armed forces male parent after the male parent was vaccinated. Afterward a prolonged admission, and a week of experimental treatments including immune globulin from donor blood and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The mother also required treatment and virus was found all over the business firm.[38]

Considering of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 report thought that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could actually have been even higher. This written report only examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the United States. If the deaths were this loftier in a state with a modern health-care arrangement, what was the full number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the nowadays beyond the entire world?

There were those in the medical community who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which once had the suffrage of the nation has now inappreciably a serious supporter. Nosotros are ashamed to jettison the thought completely and perhaps agape that if nosotros did the accident of some future epidemic might put usa in the wrong. We prefer to let compulsory vaccination die a natural expiry and are relieved that the general public is not curious enough to demand an inquest. In the meantime our attention is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this fourth dimension with vaccination as well-nigh the only medically promoted manner to deal with disease, there were doctors finding amazing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a mutual food product that is fabricated through fermentation of a diverseness of sources. An 1877 article described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. G. Oliphant, M.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the article on the employ of Acerb acid in scarlet fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" every bit applied to small pox. Dr. Roth get-go claimed wonderful success in handling regarding vinegar more reliable as a prophylactic in modest-pox than Belladonna in scarlet fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the sick and to the exposed two table-spoonfuls of vinegar, after breakfast and at evening, for fourteen days. Few persons thus treated took the illness at all. None who adopted the safety treatment died, while among those under ordinary handling the bloodshed was as usual.[40]

In 1899 Dr. Howe also demonstrated vinegar's power to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to take intendance of other people with smallpox without fear of contracting the disease. The author notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective against smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Over again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the idea of vinegar as a real preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple tree cider vinegar and no other type of vinegar should exist used iii or 4 times a day to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretary of the Western Reserve Historical Society, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the great men who for a century past have been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, at present comes to the front in the newspapers with the real preventative. "Whatever person who has been exposed need have no fear of smallpox if he will take two or three tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar 3 or four times a 24-hour interval." The discussion may now exist regarded equally closed, and smallpox at last is conquered![42]

Apple tree cider vinegar might seem airheaded, but only because near people take been conditioned to accept the age-old prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, disease-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected beast's (ordinarily a moo-cow) abdomen, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the human arm with a metallic prong until the arm was raw and bleeding. What seems sillier at present?

Scurvy is a disease that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or just an extremely poor or unbalanced diet. Vitamin C is essential for the formation of healthy collagen. Collagen is the protein that forms connective tissue in skin, basic, and blood vessels and also gives back up to internal organs. In scurvy, the body is not able to generate adequate collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve as mortar property cells together and, as a result, literally comes unglued and falls apart.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Section of Male monarch's Higher, described the poor diet of gold miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fat, coffee, and alcohol while working long, difficult days under the unrelenting California sunday. The vitamin C-deficient diet led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent amidst the gold miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, as living almost entirely upon fried salary or fat pork and flour fabricated into concoction-cakes, and fried in the fatty, which completely saturates it. This is washed down with copious librations of strong coffee, and big quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the nutrition of thousands for months, under a scorching sun, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men being at the same time subjected to the well-nigh intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Golden Rush of the mid-1800s, an estimated 10,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Civil State of war twice as many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases as those killed in battle.[44] For instance, the causes of expiry listed for Indiana soldiers buried at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy direct accounted for at to the lowest degree two-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the next common cause of decease, with the infamous diseases such every bit smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for only a small-scale fraction. Those who were killed in actual battle or who died as a result of their wounds deemed only for 1 percent of the full deaths.

Other large infectious killers such every bit scarlet fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping cough (likewise known equally pertussis) all greatly declined during this fourth dimension to where they were either completely eliminated or considered balmy childhood illnesses by the mid-1900s. This massive decline of 99% of deaths in whooping cough and measles occurred earlier vaccines or antibiotics were bachelor (Graph five & half-dozen).

Graph 5: England and Wales whooping cough mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

Graph 6: England and Wales measles bloodshed charge per unit from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale legend of a state doctor making a discovery that saved the earth from the devastation of smallpox is a fundamental medical belief that continues to exist echoed by indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a pillar of their vaccine faith. Only the true history shows us a different reality.

The brand name of vaccination was indoctrinated into the world psyche every bit something to protect someone from an illness. This belief spawned off numerous other ideas using the same notion of injecting whole or parts of disease matter into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific disease. The reality of vaccination is zippo close to the myth.

Other extremely constructive culling methods of sanitation, nutrition, apple tree cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and have since vanished from societal commonage memory. Instead we were left with the mythical history of Jenner'due south bang-up discovery and the continued onslaught of unsafe vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are now a regular matter from cradle to grave, all in the name of supposedly healthier people. Now that the curtain has been pulled back on the origins of vaccination, do more than and more vaccines seem like a good thought to you?

More than information on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping cough, and lost remedies tin be found in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk'southward book "Dissolving Illusions" which tin can be plant on amazon.com

Bibliography:
1.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
2.Science the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
3.Victor C. Vaughan, MD, Epidemiology and Public Health, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 189.
iv.Frederick F. Cartwright, Affliction and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
5.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the First Planting, Progressive Improvements and Present State of the British Settlements of North-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
6.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Knowledge and the 'Opening' of Japan, Stanford University Press, 2007, p.179.
7."The Practice of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Gentleman's Magazine and Historical Chronicle, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
8.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Case Against Vaccination, Goddard's Rooms, Gloucester, January 25, 1896, p. 12.
9.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
10.William Scott Tebb, Dr., A Century of Vaccination and What information technology Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
11."Vaccination by Act of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Journal and Review, vol. 8, July-December, 1817, p. 95.
13.Mr. Thomas Brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Present State of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, Book Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
fourteen."Observations by Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 583.
15.William Cobbett, Advice to Young Men and (Incidentally) to Young Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
sixteen.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Present Land of Vaccination in France," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Medico-chirurgical review and journal of practical medicine, vol. xx, 1834, p. 504.
18.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Communication and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical journal, vol. 4, 1834, p. 796.
19.Ephraim Cutter, MD, "Fractional Report on the Production of Vaccine Virus in the United States," Transactions of the American Medical Association, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
xx.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Morning Chronicle, Wednesday, April 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Study of Legislation Regarding Public Health in the State of New York and Massachusetts," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. iv, February 1909, p. 50-51.
24."Small-scale-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. CIV, no. vi, February 10, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Lookout, April 1911, vol. xix, no. 4, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.Thousand. W. Harman, MD, "A Medico's Statement Confronting the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Brief: A Monthly Periodical of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. 1, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June ane, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Sit-in Against Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, April 16, 1885, p. 380.
30.J. W. Hodge, MD, "Prophylaxis to exist Realized Through the Attainment of Health, Not by the Propagation of Disease," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. 15.
31.J. W. Hodge, Dr., "How Modest-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Magazine, vol. Three, no. 16, Jan, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles V. Chapin, "Variation in Blazon of Communicable diseases every bit Shown by the History of Smallpox in the United states of america," The Periodical of Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 2, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Manufactory Lancaster, An introduction to the practice of preventive medicine, C.5. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Price Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Volume 1, W.B. Saunders Company, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds Doctor and Howard A. Joos MD, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, August 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Correct to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, University of California Press, p.21.
37.The Yale journal of biological science and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. 10.
38.Maggie Play a trick on, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological back-number," Lancet, January 1, 1938, pp. 48-49.
40."Acetic Acid in Scarlet Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Journal of Medical Surgical and Sanitary Science, vol. 1, no. 1, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Prevent Smallpox," The Critique, Jan 15, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Journal of Medicine, vol. VI, no. 1, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Health. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Department of Male monarch's College," Medical Times, vol. 23, January 4 to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Benefit to Mankind, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Report of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), Nov 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed under: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Child Health Safety, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Rubber, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, authorities, Health, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, science, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines |

beerswatty1957.blogspot.com

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Share this post